BitBoy was recently arrested due to a warrant issued for threatening communications he sent to a Judge. You can read more about that here: https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/22059661159362 This market will resolve to "Yes" if BitBoy (Ben Armstrong) is convicted of any charges related to the emails he sent to Judge Kimberly Childs, by March 31, 2026 ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". Convictions must be for criminal charges. If the case is completely dropped for whatever reason, due to a plea agreement without an admission of guilt, a dismissal, or any other situation occurs in which no judgement is rendered or will be rendered by the court, this market will resolve to "No". Once an individual is convicted it qualifies for an immediate "Yes" resolution, regardless of later appeals, etc. This market will resolve based on the first conviction in a qualifying case. The primary resolution source will be official court records, however a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
ggs
The real kicker is the felony charge for threatening Judge Childs last year.
hello yes loser
good gayme
thanks everyone, see u around.
No matter what side you were on in this market, I hope you had a good time trading! Congrats to all winners, and condolences to all losers. See you in the next one ✅
Your $2M track record suggested you knew how to read a docket, but you choked on the most basic structural nuance of this contract. You missed the medical reality—Ben’s documented disabilities make a 'sound mind' plea nearly impossible to finalize as a standard conviction.
0 dollars
the oleary case doesnt count
bro bought 95c shares when he could have gotten 55c imcrine 😅
maybe somebody has the right case ;)
then why'd gooble dump to 50c?
Why aren't you buying then?
cause seems like ggs
market has finally moved past Thonker's tyranny
why is this market ao schizo? it can't decide on 10c, 50c, or 90c
Notards managed to manipulate unintelligent people
Genuinely confused as to why this would resolve to No? Go look at State Court case 25-M-1289 on the Cobb County State Court record search yourself. After representing himself, he pled guilty on Oct 23 2025 to harassing communications, got 70 days jail and 21 months probation. The docket clearly references warrant 25-W-1912, the same warrant he confirmed on X was issued because of emails he sent to Judge Childs (Mar 21). DL News, CryptoBriefing, FXStreet, and Protos all reported the same connection. and the case this market revolves around was not dropped, was not dismissed, and resulted in his guilty plea. What am I missing?
buy y to 20c? I can fill you for like 10,000 shares
You are hilarious bro, good luck with your proposal
thonker is a fucking terrorist
im unhesitant
no matter how it ends, it was really fun )
i thought yes then i thought no and now i dont know what to think
just leave it in no and go to sleep, your wallet will thank you in some hours.
always think the cheaper side :bidensmile:
THINK OF THE GAINS
aenews trolling with an alt is diabolical
what alt
I told you, Don't buy blindly do you own research and than buy, its a scam but no one listens and our no top holders said Yes have enough evidence that why I sold now he -15k with his enough evidence
the scam shook me out of my position, crazy how much they manipulate the books
we took a lot of insults, but finally the truth prevails
Amalek on No
aenews buying no on alt; it's over!
sell before 0
I've been asleep for 9 hrs, what happen
50p bought N lol
Sure.
Someone call aenews
Aenews2 wake up
He confirmed himself that the arrest and warrant was linked to the harassment if the child, hence the plea was as well : This comes after Armstrong was arrested in Volusia County, Florida, in March on a fugitive warrant for allegedly sending threatening emails to a judge. Armstrong had referenced the warrant days earlier on X.
[link removed]
The public docket for 25-M-1289 does not name Judge Childs, that part is true. But that still does not prove it was a separate unrelated case. In Georgia, State Court can handle misdemeanors even if the person involved is a Superior Court judge, so “different court” is not enough. What is verified is: Armstrong said the arrest warrants were because of emails to Judge Childs, later reporting said the Florida fugitive case stemmed from those emails, and the verified Georgia case 25-M-1289 later ended with guilty pleas to harassing communications. So the public evidence still points to the same overall Childs-email matter unless someone can show an official separate case file that says otherwise
Busy now, see you in UMA later
The rules are pretty clear idk where you wanna go with all that vague stuff. Convicted? No.
a no contest plea would be considered a “plea without an admission of guilt” - he pled guilty and served time, you can argue it’s not clear what case that’s for but that clearly counts as a conviction.
So even with this argumentation it will resolve to no. Them rules strict, and nothing to prove imo
He confirmed himself that the warrants and the arrest in Florida are linked to this harresment.