This market will resolve to "Yes" if previously unreleased documents containing evidence that Jeffrey Epstein blackmailed any individual are made public by December 31, 2025, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". Blackmail is defined as any use or attempted use of compromising materials or information (such as photos, videos, documents, or incriminating knowledge) to coerce, extort, manipulate, or otherwise gain leverage over a specific person or persons. Qualifying evidence that Epstein blackmailed any individual requires one of the following: - A direct statement within the newly released files demonstrating that Epstein blackmailed any individual or group. - A clear consensus of credible reporting indicating that the newly released files show that Epstein blackmailed any individual or group. - A clear consensus of credible reporting indicating that Epstein used any materials released as part of the newly released files for blackmail. General references to Epstein possessing damaging information, vague insinuations, or speculative commentary will not qualify. Mentions of “leverage,” “influence,” “favors,” or similar language will not qualify unless clearly tied to the use or attempted use of compromising materials for blackmail as defined in this market. The primary resolution sources for this market will be the content of any released files and a consensus of credible reporting.
I bought yes like a day ago when it was starting to resolve for like 60cents.. i dont see any indication that I won something? Its not even congratulating me like it usually does.
aenews is a scammer
Hahahaha, never bet against aenews.
Why is the other blackmail market not resolved then?
Another polymarket scam in broad daylight, very funny.
aenews does not stop
ggs, see everyone in the next market
Guys this is yes, he told me if I speak up he will turn the baby in my brain to mush
YEEES
On YES holders the big players are aenews, tourists, betwick, car, On NO holders we have bamesjong, ken, bill, scotty
This is shaping up to be a delicious drama to watch, with high powered poly sharps on both sides. I suggest bosaurum not clarify this and stress test uma for ambiguous outcomes
Market rules doesn’t require to verify credibility of a direct statement from the evidence.
It's clearly Yes. Thonker's argument won't work as this document is stronger than the last one (which was clarified Y) since it explicitly indicates blackmail rather than just implied.
Epstein def blackmailed Bill Gates, check voidzilla (coffeezilla) on youtube
@Alexparker, for your own wellbeing vote NO.
the blackmail alleger last time was much more credible, cited by the investigators as a victim of Epstein. Here, the caller is not named. Anyone can call the FBI and say anything. The third-to-last paragraph, while not totally fitting this situation, seems to imply that some level of credibility is required for the evidence which would probably exclude this. I mean, this person called in 2020, well after the arrest, five times in an hour, talking about child sacrifices and saying "the STDs then turned the victim's brain to mush." It really seems like some random crazy person from the internet called in; I don't think this should qualify as evidence.
I think ur just scared to lose all that money thats why u come up with random hopless things like that
Actually a valid point
48 k no that must be hard
must be harder only being able to afford 96 shares
dude but on that market...damn
Credibility is not required since it fulfills "A direct statement within the newly released files demonstrating that Epstein blackmailed any individual or group. "
These complaint calls are publicly-accessible via FOIA request. It's quite possible there's another qualifying file in the new releases somewhere, but I don't think this alone will cut it since it's not really anything anyone couldn't get before.
someone propose
It’s joever
As long as thonker loses, I’m happy.
direct quote from the file [link removed] - "Sex and STDs were then used as black mail against rape victims from the ranch."
guys be careful, read the rules, not sure if this actually will be a yes: The DOJ and FBI have repeatedly stated (including in prior memos from 2025 and reaffirmed in coverage of this drop) that there is no credible evidence Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals