This market will resolve to “Yes” if definitive evidence confirming that Jeffrey Epstein acted as a foreign agent—defined as someone operating under the direction, control, or sponsorship of a foreign government—is made public by December 31, 2025, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. A “foreign agent” is defined as an agent, asset, informant, operative, or equivalent who acted on behalf of, or under the direction, control, or sponsorship of, a foreign government or its intelligence or security services. Evidence or reporting that merely alleges, speculates, or suggests possible foreign government ties will not qualify unless presented as established fact. Epstein must have actually taken actions on behalf of a foreign government. Mere contact, cooperation, or association with foreign government officials or entities will not qualify without evidence of direction, control, or sponsorship. The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from any U.S. government agency, law enforcement agencies, and courts. However, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
[link removed] .gov/epstein/files/DataSet%201/[link removed]
"consensus of credible reporting may also be used." - yeah, of course
How many more ex-government people do we need to say that everyone in congress knows Epstein was working for multiple foreign agencies? [link removed]
Thomas Massie Congressman of Kentucky said it damn it what do you need more than this :
[link removed]
Alberta noticers 🤝
What do you need god damn it? A Reuters article?
Pay up whales! We won you lose! [link removed]
its original [link removed]
Can we fucking settle it or we absolutely needs the damn whales with a Reuter articles smh 🙄
Israeli Intelligence Officer Ari Ben Menashe claims that Netanyahu is blackmailing Trump with the Epstein files. [link removed]
even posthumously Epstein is an Isreali gov agent
Why isn't this settled as a yes then?
Please some UMA whale, submit this - it's free money: Three categories of evidence released late 2025 satisfy the market's requirements for confirming foreign agent status. Primary Source: Barak emails archive (100,000+ emails 2007-2016) released by Handala, hosted at ddosecrets com/article/ehud-barak-emails Media Coverage: - dropsitenews com/p/israeli-spy-yoni-koren-stayed-jeffrey-epstein-apartment-ehud-barak - democracynow org/2025/11/12/epstein_israel - oversight house gov/release/oversight-committee-releases-additional-epstein-estate-documents - dropsitenews com/p/jeffrey-epstein-ehud-barak-leaked-emails-mongolia-security-deal
Rule 1: "Definitive evidence made public by Dec 31, 2025" - House Oversight Committee releases (Sept-Nov 2025) - Drop Site investigation (Sept-Nov 2025) - All within deadline Market allows "consensus of credible reporting" beyond official statements. Multiple mainstream outlets (Democracy Now, Common Dreams, Truthout, FAIR) now report Barak-Epstein operational relationship as established fact from authenticated documents - not speculation. This crosses threshold from "merely alleges" to "presented as established fact."
Rule 2: "Operating under the direction, control, or sponsorship of a foreign government" Direction: Feb 2015 email shows Ehud Barak (former Israeli PM/Defense Minister) sending Epstein wire transfer instructions for Yoni Koren (Israeli military intelligence officer). Explicit operational tasking - Barak directing Epstein to serve as financial intermediary for active intelligence operative. Sponsorship: House Oversight calendars confirm Koren stayed at Epstein's Manhattan apartment for extended periods (Feb 2013, Oct 2014, Sept 2015) conducting intelligence activities. Providing operational base/safe house for foreign intelligence officer = material sponsorship. Control: Pattern of correspondence shows ongoing coordination between Barak and Epstein on intelligence-linked activities, with Barak guiding Epstein's involvement.
Rule 3: "Actually taken actions on behalf of foreign government" Documented actions: - Financial cutout for Israeli intelligence (wire transfer tasking) - Operational infrastructure provision (housing intelligence officer) - State security deal brokering: - Israel-Mongolia security cooperation (2014) - Israel-Russia Syria backchannel (2013) - Barak explicitly thanked Epstein for arranging Putin meeting - Israel-Cote d'Ivoire surveillance tech deal These advance Israeli strategic interests under coordination with Israeli officials. Rules require actions "on behalf of" foreign government - facilitating formal security agreements and diplomatic channels clearly qualifies, distinguishing from "mere contact, cooperation, or association."
wait how does this not resolve yes? 1) barak emails (nov release) have literal wire transfer instructions to israeli intel officer 2) house committee released epsteins calendars showing koren (mossad-linked) staying at his place for weeks 3) dropsite proved he brokered israel-mongolia security deals. thats direction + sponsorship + actions no?
not enough whales forcing UMA
imagine the flip if polymarket was actually stating the obvious and forcing narratives the mass media had to relay to
yes will trade much higher soon, regardless of resolution
nvm @bobe2 is here buying a bunch of No at 98c, this will probably be another UMA farm regardless of what happens
December 19... I've got a lot riding on this
now way this doesnt jump to +50% with all the revelations coming up next month
every human being on Earth is(or was) a mossad opererative, so why not Jeffrey?
It actually become pretty obvious he was Mossad's operative after you read the biography of Maxwell's father, however the chances it'll be disclosed in newly released files are pretty low imo.
"Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu shared an article on X Friday from an American socialist anti-Israeli publication suggesting that disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein once worked for Israeli intelligence."
play
started with $800, now at $3.5k this month. polymarket different when you're early to every play
i love comment here from yes holder keep entertained me
Why did you make a half-portfolio bet on this at 96?
I mean I can put 200k usdc on polymarket if I want
materials will be published in 30 days
Price is too low, some materials will be published, no matter how many redactions they do, if he was a foriegn agent, which is a very good bet, there will be some information there that can be pieced together to point to it, if that starts getting reported on this Yes will rip as "a consensus of credible reporting may also be used" .