This market will resolve to "Yes" if any appointed elector in the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election votes for someone other than the candidate they pledged to support. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the US government, however a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
[link removed]
someone propose
If an elector attempts to cast a faithless vote and is either forced to change their vote or replaced with someone who doesn't vote unfaithfully does that count as a yes or a no?
If the person does not vote in an unfaithful manner, it logically does not count; if instead he manages to vote, then he is considered unfaithful.
It will count as an UMA dispute, have fun!
The US is such a failed democracy. They can't even run a simple presidential properly.
It will happen because Trump won.
least 1 dem to rop i guess
DDHQ now giving Democrats 19,5%
Why did the dumbass not mention the number of faithless electors in 2020? 🤔 MUH METACULUS, MUH "TRUMP IS POLARIZING"