Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are currently scheduled to debate on September 10, 9 PM ET in an event hosted by ABC News. This market will resolve to “Kamala” if Kamala Harris is the Polymarket favorite to win the election one day after the debate. This market will resolve to “Trump” if Donald Trump is the favorite to win. The favorite to win one day after the debate will be determined by looking at the 4 hour time window 24 hours after the debate is scheduled to begin, between Sep 11, 9 PM ET and 1 AM ET. This market will resolve to whichever candidate is ahead more than the other during this period. The resolution source will be a comparison between the charts for each candidate found at https://polymarket.com/event/presidential-election-winner-2024 when the “6H” option is selected and decimals are turned on (settings icon -> Decimals toggled on). If the debate is postponed or cancelled, the rules will apply to the date one day after the first debate is rescheduled to begin. If no debate occurs before the election, this market will resolve to 50-50. The relevant data points will be those each minute during 9 PM ET to 1 AM ET (i.e. 9:00, 9:01 up to 12:59 AM ET) for each of the candidates. Each of these data points will be compared minute-by-minute, and this market will resolve to whichever candidate is ahead more than the other. For example if they are tied in 160 data points, Trump is ahead in 60 data points, and Harris is ahead in 20 data points, this market would resolve to "Trump."
i told everyone, with Kamala it's a different game than Joe. she is not OLD JOE/HILLARY. she is younger & sharper & more energized. and the game needs to be adjusted to fit this framing to try and give a counter fight.
i would hammer on how much lofe got much harder to the every-day Amricans. less reminding the Ultra-Rich that gonna get even richer, on the expanse of the everyday Americans, through the Tariffs Tax on them. and we need to place Tariffs on BRICS & co. to calm them a bit. like we needed more immigration to counter China population collapse.
Trump shouldn't ho "Old Man Yelling At The Clowds", in another debate with a professional prosecutor that KNOWS how to prepare to debates style court.
that game only could have worked with Confused-Joe
and Kamala's people should remind that he doesn't want another debate, daily.
told Trmp's pep not to go debate, and bring it ONLY straight to the voters 🤷
so Trump want ROUND 2.0 ? you better fucking practice him with Kamala surrogate, and videos & resharpening. like it's an NFL preparation, with maneuvers books.
Romain on Bloomberg: "Trump Cats & Dogs. Gold is High Today, Buy More Now ? Buy High Sell Low.".... thought Bloomberg's Minions
..... following my zeitgeist only on X. so few people in the fin-scene we are, aren't we ?
mostly rubbing each-other. not too many retailers to rub like with CovidCrowd on 21'/22'
no new QE liquidy... same bucket water levels.. just shifting the wates around the rich & ultra
"interest on interest accumulating to widows and idiot sons, and what I do, stock and real estate speculation. It's bullshit. You got ninety percent of the American public out there with little or no net worth. I create nothing. I own."
YOU FUCKERS. and i sold for loss, after avreging 32 on buys. LIKE. I. SAID. Cassandra Zeitgeist 💯-Made-Of
spoils to the winners,. nevertheless fuckers 🎩
Bahahaha how was I expecting you to come back and feel the shame maybe next time don't get shaken out
that's ZionLion 🤷 goes ape-shit when it goes against me... roaring like a lion on triumphs... handing advices like old owl. 🦁🦍🦉🎩
Biased poll, most polls on Insta and X have Teump winning. They were planning to declare her the winnier long before the debate because their last candidate droped out because he was a zombie who got destroyed objectively by Trump.
X is the definition of a biased sample poll.
Your claim that polls on Instagram and X are more reliable than official polling is flawed. Social media polls aren't scientifically conducted; they rely on a non-representative sample and tend to reflect the biases of the followers of those accounts, not the general public. Calling the previous candidate a "zombie" doesn't address actual debate performance or policies. What evidence do you have that the results were predetermined? If you're confident Trump "destroyed" past opponents, why avoid using verifiable data like credible polls to back up the claim?
dumbass. thanks for your contribution to my next vacay
do you understand how insanely retarded you have to be to cite twitter polls ? its a neo nazi website filled to the brim with bots, polls there mean nothing whatsoever
gg
I was originally not optimistic about Trump's attitude towards the 2025 plan during the debate. This result is in line with expectations.
420 for lyf
You buying a new house with your winnings lol?? Congrats lol, shoulda bet with u haha
Good luck finding a decent house for 400k under kamala’s plan
every bit helps
omg who won?
Go woke, never be broke.
You have never placed a bet, if u wanna just talk go to Twitter lol
Easy money
it's ogre folks
https://polymarket.com/event/favorite-to-win-on-polymarket-one-week-after-debate/favorite-to-win-on-polymarket-one-week-after-debate?tid=1726111852665
Kamala 114 - Trump 23 - Ties 14. It's over
its over now
its over
big question is, is kamala gonna collapse now?
Current score: 108 - 23 (ties excluded) in favor of Kamala
In just a few minutes, it will be mathematically impossible for Trump to come back
not over 5 mins
Still not over