This market will resolve to “Yes” if Elon Musk rings the bell at a bell ceremony on SpaceX’s first day of trading. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.” If no SpaceX IPO or qualifying bell ceremony occurs by December 31, 2027, 11:59 PM ET, the market will resolve to "No". Bell-ringing ceremonies which take place outside of SpaceX's first day of trading will not be considered. Qualifying Requirements: - Elon Musk must be physically present at the ceremony. - The ceremony must be at the venue of SpaceX's primary exchange. - The purpose of the ceremony must be to commemorate the opening or closing of the regular trading session of SpaceX’s primary exchange on SpaceX's first day of trading. - Elon Musk must singularly or jointly participate in ringing or activating the physical or digital bell of the primary exchange through touch or force. Non-qualifying examples: - Elon Musk rings a bell at a private SpaceX ceremony. - Elon Musk tells someone else to ring the bell on his behalf. - Elon Musk issues a voice command to any device that it should play a ringing sound. - Elon Musk presses play on a ringing sound effect from his phone. - Elon Musk appears virtually at the bell ringing ceremony. - Elon Musk rings the bell from a location other than the primary exchange's physical venue. The resolution source will be photos or videos.
The market should resolve to YES because Nasdaq officially described the IPO bell ceremony as a single coordinated event taking place at both Nasdaq MarketSite and SpaceX’s Starbase facility. This shows the ceremony was distributed across multiple official exchange-approved locations rather than being separate events. The rules require Elon Musk to participate in ringing or activating the bell at the venue of the primary exchange. Since Nasdaq itself presented the IPO bell moment as one unified ceremony, “venue” should reasonably be interpreted as the official Nasdaq IPO event as a whole, not a single fixed physical location. Musk participated in the official bell activation as part of this Nasdaq-sanctioned ceremony. The rules do not explicitly exclude distributed or multi-location formats organized by the exchange, so under a reasonable interpretation, the requirements for YES are satisfied.
Non-qualifying examples: - Elon Musk rings a bell at a private SpaceX ceremony
fill me up, i can put more liq if you need
The market should resolve to YES because Nasdaq officially described the IPO bell ceremony as taking place at both Nasdaq MarketSite and SpaceX’s Starbase facility, meaning it was a single coordinated exchange event across multiple official locations. Elon Musk participated in the official bell activation as part of this Nasdaq-sanctioned IPO ceremony. The rules only require participation in ringing or activating the bell at the venue of the primary exchange and do not explicitly require physical presence at a single fixed trading floor when the exchange itself defines the ceremony as distributed across official locations. Therefore, under a reasonable interpretation of the rule and Nasdaq’s own framing of the event, the conditions for YES are satisfied.
"A historic bell-ringing ceremony took place at both Nasdaq MarketSite and SpaceX's Starbase facility in Texas."Nasdaq Newsroom
Non-qualifying examples: - Elon Musk rings a bell at a private SpaceX ceremony.
The NO argument relies on a strict reading of “physical presence at the exchange venue,” but this interpretation is not fully supported by the market’s own wording. 1. The rules define the requirement as participation in ringing/activating the bell at the venue of the primary exchange, but do not explicitly require that all participants must be physically located at a single trading floor if the exchange itself conducts an official distributed IPO ceremony. 2. Elon Musk’s participation was part of the official Nasdaq-sanctioned IPO bell ceremony, which constitutes the qualifying event. The venue is defined by the exchange event itself, not narrowly limited to one physical room. 3. The NO case incorrectly treats “physical presence” as requiring a single fixed location, while the market language allows for interpretation based on official exchange recognition of the ceremony format. 4. Resolution is based on official photos and videos of the IPO bell ceremony, which show Musk actively participating in the bell moment as part of the exchange-led event, not a private or separate appearance. Therefore, NO depends on an overly narrow interpretation of “venue,” while YES is consistent with how the exchange officially conducted and presented the IPO bell ceremony.
shut yo bitchass up
That’s all you’ve got? Weak.
🟢 YES argument The market should resolve to YES because Elon Musk participated in the official Nasdaq IPO bell ceremony on SpaceX’s first trading day. The ceremony was an official exchange-sanctioned event, and Musk actively participated in the bell activation as part of it. The rules only require participation in ringing or activating the bell at the exchange venue, and do not explicitly exclude distributed or multi-location official ceremonies. Since Musk took part in the official bell moment under Nasdaq’s IPO listing event framework on the first trading day, the conditions for YES are met.
Musk rang the bell at an official exchange — Nasdaq Texas SpaceX dual-listed on two official exchanges: Nasdaq NY and Nasdaq Texas. Both are “primary exchanges” for SPCX. Musk was physically present at the Nasdaq Texas ceremony in Starbase and physically activated the bell — confirmed by video. The resolution criteria state “venue of SpaceX’s primary exchange” — Nasdaq Texas is an official exchange where SPCX trades, and Starbase is its venue. This was not a private SpaceX ceremony and not a remote appearance — it was an officially Nasdaq-organized ceremony at an official exchange. The non-qualifying example “rings the bell from a location other than the primary exchange’s physical venue” does not apply — because Starbase is the venue of one of the primary exchanges.
Elon was at starbase, Texas during opening ceremony
Elon was physically at Starbase, Texas during the bell ceremony, not at the Nasdaq exchange venue. The rule is explicit: physical presence at the venue of the primary exchange is required. A remote participation site is not the exchange venue, and therefore this fails the core condition for a valid YES resolution.
If Elon pressed the official button as part of Nasdaq’s opening ceremony, the real question is whether that qualifies as activating the bell — not whether he stood in New York.
1¢ feels way too cheap here. The market is pricing this as if Elon Musk ringing the bell on SpaceX’s first trading day is almost impossible. But if a SpaceX IPO happens before the deadline, Musk being present at such a historic moment is far from a 1% event. This looks like a classic case where the market may be underestimating a low-probability outcome with massive upside.
I always see you on the losing side of this shit 🤣
lmaooo, "This looks like a classic case where" BRUTAL ai slop
the bell is already rung, elon was in spacex hq
non qualifying examples - Elon Musk rings the bell from a location other than the primary exchange's physical venue. Thanks for the dono
gg
he is in Texas sp yeah, not happening
he wont ring the bell cause he will be busy doing ketamine
到纽约了吗
yu p
my biggest fear is that he’ll have a sudden whim to let his son ring the bell
Elon is an events guy, he goes to events less important. Why would he not go the largest IPO in history and a chance to ring the bell.
thank you for your donation since you obviously did not check where elon is right now through his jet nor did you read the WSJ article that specified only SpaceX execs being present and not naming Elon.
Source?
search for Everything You Need to Know About the SpaceX Trading Debut it says SpaceX executives are set to ring the Nasdaq’s opening bell in New York, but shares in buzzy initial public offerings don’t tend to start trading until later in the day. elon musk is part of the execs?
Why No?????
why No is sitting at high is there any inside info
100% yes