Before 2027$113K Vol.This market will resolve to “Yes” if any Federal or State jurisdiction of the United States formally charges or otherwise announces a criminal indictment of Governor Tim Walz by March 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. For the purposes of this market the District of Columbia and any county, municipality, or other subdivision of a State shall be included within the definition of a State. The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from US governmental sources, however a wide consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
huge spread broskis
[link removed]
Minnesota’s Walz, Ellison to testify before Congress: The Kentucky Republican called on Mr. Walz and Mr. Ellison to provide documents, communications and records about the possible fraud, also requesting that the Treasury Department provide all relevant Suspicious Activity Reports to the committee. he looks forward to questioning the Minnesota duo under oath “to ensure transparency and accountability for the American people and to consider meaningful reforms that prevent waste, fraud and abuse of taxpayer funds.”
I still like Walz to be charged by end of year. Just feels like they got too much on him to let it go, check out episode 16 of the Poly Marks Podcast where we discuss
He and others will be, for sure.
I've been getting my ass kicked on poly ever since I started, I hope I actually win for once
I wonder why, what a mystery
maybe it's because you're a dumbass
subpoena served
I still like the yes even though the its jumped up. I discussed why on the latest episode of the Poly Marks Podcast, check it out
The prediction for Walz to resign is 50X and has higher odds then this one with high liquidity.
If he gets charged, he's going to resign. He's going to resign soon anyway.
The resign prediction will pay more then this one.
An investigation is not the same as a charge. But it could be prelude to one.
[link removed]
FOUR ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT just filed against Tim Walz in the Minnesota House. Doesn't this count as a yes?
Agreed. What is the difference between?
This guy is so toast. What a trader. If not for fraud certainly for sedition.
"trader"
voice text, let's hope
[link removed]
no means losing 80%
Fraud money came back as campaign donation. If Somalis were stupid enough to get caught with the Learing Center, they sure didn't cover their tracks in the money flow.
I'm not sure about Walz himself, but 100% some state politicians will get scapegoated. I'm betting on that market.
No voters 👀 [link removed]
Thank you for giving NO voters even more confidence
[link removed]
Anyone betting on “yes” is an absolute buffoon 🫵🏼😂
yeah really "buffoon" to split and earn 4%
Actually anyone betting on NO for a 4% gain over 3 months is the buffoon
No thats 16% annualized
oBVIOUS ONE