Trump Admin recommends removing fluoride from water by...?

New Book: “Fluoride Harm: Suppressed Science and Silenced Voices” exposes political corruption surrounding water fluoridation written by 36 internationally recognized scientists, medical professionals, journalists and citizen advocates

ggs

Dispoot time?

[link removed]

It's politico

He tells them that everyday of the week. But they ain't listening

Utah becomes first state to ban water fluoridation

Recent paper on the subject, focusing on prenatal and childhood effects: [link removed].gov/doi/10.1289/EHP14534

TALLAHASSEE, Florida - Gov. Ron DeSantis on Tuesday praised efforts by Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo to push localities to remove fluoride to drinking water, saying he expects HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to soon follow suit. [link removed]

RFK Jr is the goat

Will vote no on this market next week

If you're looking for another market to bet against MAGA whales, check out https://polymarket.com/event/will-ukraine-agree-to-payback-us-aid-before-july/will-ukraine-agree-to-payback-us-aid-before-july . There's 1 or 2 whales blindly trusting Trump despite everything Zelensky and the actual agreement language actually says.

yo nice one thank you

This is a subject on Joe Rogan every now and then, I think this topic is getting bigger and bigger every day. This will definitely come, the only question is: will it come before April 29?

As of now, he is waiting for his people to be appointed; some moves are going to come soon.

[link removed]

this will be yes

this will be no

compressed info about the topic, on a recent article: [link removed]

Don't sell yes, please double down. Someone put up a big yes buy at 30c please. I will fill.

I'm on your side, I want people to buy Yes

I'm trolling you guys yes. But I really would like to buy more No. If my trolling can get someone to rage buy Yes, all the better.

I'll leave up some of my bids but if I still can't get any fills I'll def take up your offer at .2

hey leave some for us hoes too!

This is what would happen if RFK tried to push a policy change without going through the proper scientific channels: 1) He would be sued to oblivion by the ADA and many other orgs for violating the Public Health Service Act which is the statute that sets up the mandate for the USPHS. 2) There would be mass resignations at all levels within orgs governed by the HHS. 3) He would probably be impeached (or at least serious calls for his impeachment would arise) for damaging public health by not governing through science. He knows all this, his lawyers know this. Right now he is already controversial because of his lack of credibility as a scientist - why the fuck would he completely obliterate any shred of credibility he has within the first 100 days and probably get himself impeached by attempting to force this through without the scientific review process?

He as HHS secretary CAN and probably WILL push for a review. He will set up an advisory panel (probably with scientists sympathetic to his cause) to initiate the process of re-evaluating fluoride levels. This is the way he can exert influence as HHS, by picking the people in charge of reviewing the guidelines. These people are going to take months to comb the literature and come up with a justification even before the part where there's pushback from stakeholders and the public comment period. What complete dreamland do you yes holders live in where you think this whole process will be fast?

But again, I'm just a retard with a negative PnL remember? Disregard everything I say - I want to counterparty you more.

At this point I hope he tweets something else to make this pump yes. There's no more liquidity right now to make any trades.

You're so wrong its painful. If you can't understand why removing a recommendation that has been in place since 1962 is not a major policy change which JFK can't unilaterally make then I can't help you. Honestly I don't want to help you. Please keep convincing people to sell me dollars at a discount.

What the actual fuck are you smoking? Jesus, anybody who believes that the HHS can just willy nilly change vaccine policy without any process deserves to lose their money here.

God I want to, will you be my counterparty?

People who are fixated on the fact that this isn't related to a law are in complete delulu land. You guys know that in 2015 the PHS changed the recommendation from [link removed] mg/L to just 0.7 right? Did you guys also know that a review of the recommendation was publicly mentioned as being reviewed as early as 2011? It took at least FOUR YEARS to change it last time and that was barely a change. If you guys were scientists you would know we take our shit very seriously and take our time to make sure to come to the RIGHT conclusion. RFK can not single handedly overturn the entire science bureaucracy by himself.

Proof by the way: [link removed]

But never mind that, you guys can continue on with your fantasy that it's easy for him because it's not a "law". I still have more bids that need filling

Fluoride is a neurotoxin that directly affects the pineal gland. Suppression of pineal gland function is key to the mass hypnosis of the public

I know your trolling cause you hold no, but just for the record for any yessers here prone to believing in bad science: Yes there's some bioacculumulation of fluoride in the pineal gland (along with some other organs) but there is ample scientific consensus that this does not affect their function and accumulated levels are modest at levels found in water. Also, the pineal gland regulates sleep - conspiracy theories about mass hypnosis are just lol.

No, I moved to Switzerland in 2019 but I have plenty of old colleagues who are in the CDC and NIH

Spoiler: the hypnotised aren't aware that they are hypnotised

Since I do want some more liquidity I'll tell you the one way this can be expedited: RFK would need to declare a public health emergency (like when COVID happened). That's the only way to push through a new policy quickly. So maybe he does that - buy yes I have orders that need filling.

I already answered your question below. This isn't about new studies its about review of existing data. Please tell me you understand the difference between de novo studies verses a literature review before buying 3k shares

this can happen within a 100-day period. If there is immense political pressure, the HHS Secretary can instruct the CDC and related agencies to move quickly, potentially completing the process in just 2-3 weeks if it is purely about withdrawing the recommendation.

How much more Yes do you want? You wanna put up some more liquidity for me?

bro you're supposed to be buying not selling! It can happen within a 100 day period remember? What are you doing?

if the HHS Secretary is only withdrawing the fluoride recommendation (without requiring any new laws or congressional approval), they can indeed instruct the change to happen unilaterally, within the CDC or USPHS (which falls under HHS). Since recommendations are non-binding and don’t require legislation, this simplifies the process significantly.

For the record - that's hilarious. None of the process I described ever has anything to do with new laws or congressional approval. That's just the base case process for policy revisions.

Whelp, liquidity is fucked so I might as well just spell it out for people. To change something like fluoride guidance you need 1) Set up an advisory committee to review existing literature. 2) In collaboration with interagency (e.g. CDC, FDA etc.) experts, develop a new set of proposed guidelines 3) Public comment and key stakeholder engagement period 4) Multiple revision cycles and legal review 5) Finally implementation

Anybody claiming RFK can just unilaterally come in a declare this shit has clearly never interacted with the scientific bureaucracy.

Or maybe I'm full of shit - someone come in with a big Yes buy, I still have more funds.