This market will resolve to "Yes" if the U.S. Government initiates an official audit or investigation into U.S. foreign aid sent to Ukraine by April 30, 2025, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". A qualifying audit/investigation must be specifically directed at U.S. foreign aid sent to Ukraine. General audits of the Department of Defense or State Department will not alone qualify. The primary resolution source for this market will be information from the US federal government, however a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
Gena you are most miserable trader i ever encountered on this website
Yo u going to dispute yes?
Gena is right, I checked the document
Gena the gay
Minecraft is an awesome game
why tf ts pumped i was so confused why my portfolio went higher for 1sec for no reason
what a horrible failed scam attempt by Gena. never forget this guys
gena do u wanna buy my yes shares for 39c . i want to get them away :3
im gonna get fucked so hard oh no!
could you guys fill me lower
oh noo... Yes is pumping....!!!!
[link removed] This audit could literally settle this whole debate with a clear "YES" whats going on here lol
Is Polymarket seriously corrupted? There’s literally no way this market should settle as NO after reading that audit.
Well I and others argued, and Polymarket clarified it wasn't enough. So we're stuck on N now, unless there's a big change with further audits.
im just wondering how rules can be rewrited when there is no start date of audit only deadline
But wait, the argument 2 arguer argues, there is no start date in the rules! So there's no requirement for it to start past then! It could be from any amount of time before, as long as it's new info! Response: come on. Plenty of markets don't have a start date; it's implied to be market creation.
this is obviously cant be played. coz there are the rules and in rules there is clearly no startdate
or polymarket clarify with the new rules but then market on yes must be voided
or played as YES coz there was an audits before deadline
you made a bunch of racks on inside info as i can see)
wut? I am literally negative in the market because I had Y
You literally always bet on 1.1 odds where the outcome’s already known - since you're the verifier on Polymarket, kinda obvious from your ROI
Results so far - it’s very close. 6,940,839 votes for Too Early vs… 305 votes vs No… ok maybe not so close.
Voting starts in a hour...
Who wrote this clarification?
Biden
aenews2 and Betwick changed sides and loaded up on "NO" - so it's obviously going to be No now - Yes, holders just sell now
I was never on Yes ;)
ACA provides funds that directly aid Ukraine, eg by sending 150 forensic experts. In-kind aid is aid. So, I disagree with the clarification, but I accept it. Kudos to Polymarket for handling this well. Congrats to the No holders for now! See you another time :)
So far the discussion on Discord seems very likely that UMA will be resolved to "YES"
No crying in the casino libtards
@LittleCryBabyBro please stop to cry like a little baby bro
LMAO WHY SOLD YOUR SHIT YOU LITTLE CRY BABY BRO
guys buy my shares for 80c and u will have good luck!
this one however investigates funds that are directly provided to ukraine
[link removed]
Same story read the documetn
What story? I think you don't get what forms aid usually takes. This is a program to directly financially aid Ukraine