This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump signs any federal legislation or performs any executive action that has the effect of eliminating time changes (currently biannual) associated with Daylight Saving Time in the United States by April 29, 2025, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". The legislation or action does not need to be binding or enforced in all states for this market to resolve to "Yes." Any bill signed into law or executive action taken within this market's time frame will qualify, regardless of when the law or action goes into effect.
This is going to be a sleeper market. Daylight Savings start on March 9th while Trump's first 100 days end April 30th. This probably wont be focused on until mid February but when it does this market will rocket
💀
[link removed]
Thanks for the support. I sold out of my position.
Oh, come on. There is no way that's possible
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump signs any federal legislation or performs any executive action that has the effect of eliminating time changes (currently biannual) associated with Daylight Saving Time in the United States by April 29, 2025, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". - the bill Rick Scott introduce will keep DST permanent but per rules it will apply even though it doesnt elimate DST
They passed it essentially by accident. Go back and read the news coverage.
Oopsie how did we pass this?
There is no consensus on standard vs DST, that's why this will never pass.
Correct. Read the news coverage.
Wow those news stories are hilarious lol
"Oopsie"? 🤣 What a child.
This is going to be a sleeper market. Daylight Savings start on March 9th while Trump's first 100 days end April 30th. This probably wont be focused on until mid February but when it does this market will rocket
Sheeeeet
never, impossible
How do y’all interpret this? “The legislation or action does not need to be binding or enforced in all states for this market to resolve to "Yes."”
The rules say Trump’s action must have “the effect of eliminating time changes.” How can it have that effect if it’s not binding or enforced?
Thank you!
Yes you're right. It's why No is priced so high. There are tons of obstacles that 100 days wise, Trump has way more things to focus on before tackling DST lol. Ukraine, H1Bs, alone will keep him occupied for 6 months minimum.
We technically want daylight savings to be made permanent remember. Permanent later sunsets year round
nothing ever happens on this front.
Have you ever seen the sun set at 3pm?
What do people have against daylight
Because they've gotten bipartisan support for the past century has it? Surely Congress doesn't have any history of standing in legislature's way especially Trump. Yea good fucking luck in the first HUNDRED days shit changes
Again a red herring fallacy. Nothing you said answers my clear dispute. Also passing the senate in the FIRST HUNDRED DAYS? Gee, Congress sure lovesss Trump. GOP can't even confirm the appointees from start of November for their OWN party, and apparently a bipartisan Congress will actually ENACT not just pass a bill (fully knowing it'll be vetoed anyway) AGAINST THEIR CORPORATE DONORS. It's like y'all don't know how Congress 'works' or doesn't work. I'll agree it MIGHT happen in a year's time, but 100 days under the famous Trump-hating Congress, yea good luck.
Again red herring fallacy. Look spamming doesn't make you right. Again read. Putting up a bill =/= Congress passing and enacting Trump's plan in HUNDRED days.
Haha clock dont go DST
[link removed]
Lmao @Goethe total fake news, how is Elon showing some random anon's comment on Daylight Saving = TRUMP eliminating daylight saving WITHIN the next 100 days?
He will do it, se [link removed]
Bruh, how is Elon showing some random anon's comment on Daylight Saving = TRUMP eliminating daylight saving WITHIN the next 100 days?
You assign a probability and buy, or don't. If Trump puts Musk in the DOGE and Musk tweets about DST ... it seems reasonable to assign a probability to the "Elimination of DST" event, believing that Musk may suggest this as an efficiency measure in his role in the DOGE.
Let's not change the point. "He WILL do it" - that is attributed CERTAINTY not probability, and to SOMEONE else. Mate I can say I want to be the President of the United States, sure that increases the odds, but it's still 0 cents worth.