On April 2, 2025, Donald Trump announced a 34% reciprocal tariff on all imports from China, set to take effect on April 9, 2025, at 12:01 a.m. EDT, in addition to an existing 20% tariff (totaling 54%), as part of the “Liberation Day” tariff plan (see: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2025/04/02/regulating-imports-with-a-reciprocal-tariff-to-rectify-trade-practices-that-contribute-to-large-and-persistent-annual-united-states-goods-trade-deficits/). This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump signs any federal legislation or performs any executive action that lowers, pauses, delays, or removes any tariffs on imports from China by April 30, 2025, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. Actions that lower, pause, delay, or remove any tariffs on Chinese imports will qualify, including changes to the 34% reciprocal tariff, the existing 20% tariff, or any other existing or new tariffs specifically targeting Chinese goods. Only the removal of tariffs specifically targeting China will qualify. For example, the removal of the 10% general tariff on all imports into the U.S., or a tariff on specific Chinese provinces or entities, will not count toward this market’s resolution. Any action officially enacted within the market’s time frame will qualify, regardless of when the change goes into effect. This market’s primary resolution source will be official information from the Trump administration; however, a consensus of credible information from major news outlets or government statements will also be used.
UMA Scam
According to their rules, the market should have resolved to Yes only if there was a clear action to lower, pause, delay, or remove tariffs. But no such action happened. In fact, tariffs were increased under the Liberation Day plan. Despite this, Polymarket resolved the market as Yes, which clearly goes against their own rules. This feels like a lack of transparency and a breach of trust. Personally, I will not use this platform again, and I advise others to be cautious when dealing with them. Platforms like this need to be clear and fair to maintain the communitys trust. Greetings from Madrid, Spain.
"House always wins"
Only the removal of tariffs specifically targeting China will qualify. For example, the removal of the 10% general tariff on all imports into the U.S., or a tariff on specific Chinese provinces or entities, will not count toward this market’s resolution. Why market are closed ? trump didnt lower the tariffs on china
Today still no lower the taxes from USA for China. Polymarket really fuck this up
scam
300$ EN PERDIDA EESTO ES UNA ESTAFAAAAAAAAAAA
yahuuu
lol this platform is such a scam
Lol my first and last bet here, fuck that scam
Mb, it kinda makes sense this market resolution
Do not be surprised with the results. This is a san site. Bet on other platforms
what are other platforms that are as good?
I’m working on one with crazy bets like on peoples “health” if you know what I mean. as well as the rest of what you bet on here. but there’s huge legal so it’s taking me a while
no way jits are still malding 2 days l8ter
Why yes? : The 34% reciprocal tariff only applies to Chinese imports, full stop. Other countries weren’t subject to that tariff in the first place, so removing smartphones from that tariff "only affects China." It doesn't matter if other countries also make smartphones what matters is that only Chinese smartphones were facing the tariff, and now they’re excluded. That’s a tariff reduction on imports from China under a China-specific tariff regime. The exemption doesn’t need to restate "China" when the tariff it modifies already targets China exclusively.
SCAM!! Refund! Ri Ni Ma,Lao Deng,Tui $Qian!!
The irony of the WH talking about 245% tariffs and this market resolves as yes LOL
Oh come on, it can't be, is this your first day at the polymarket? I'm not surprised, this happens here every week
Sorry No holders, but YES is correct according to the Rules. If you don't agree, re-read it. Simple as that. This is not a UMA scam. I have no skin in the game and being objective here.
can you elaborate?
- Yeah, see, I'm willing to hear out the "Yes" people, but I haven't seen a single person point out any specific piece of evidence as to why "Yes" SHOULD be taken seriously. Like, not a single link to any articles, any tweets, any actual policy; nothing. Meanwhile, I've seen a LOT of hard evidence favoring "No".
is there any way to file a lawsuit against polymarket? cause its april 17 and as per polymarket policy the result will be announced on 1st of may at 12.00AM they basically breached contract as no official statement were given by president trump
Share if you find one.
guys what hapend why is outcome yes there is no official news and today is april17 bruhh
is there anything else we can do
Spread the info at least, they need to be held accountable.
The scam is UMA. Polymarket will have to abandon UMA. I think they should replace with Grok, or with consensus of Grok, Gemini and DeepSeek... or anything else really. Honestly, replacing it with 8chan would do better.